On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Wouters wrote: > > > > [Guido] asked for 'f(*a, b, c)' to be valid, but it only makes sense > > to allow, say, 'f(*a, b, *c)' too, and he hasn't said 'no' to that. > > And then, of course, people are going to want > to have multiple ** arguments, too... > Of course. Anything worth doing is worth doing right. The grammar changes are done (and it turns out much simpler without these restrictions), if it weren't for this horrible cold I would have a patch for it up already. -- Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
