On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:00 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, please allow u'' in Python 3.0! With that change, my > > porting/compatibility worried would be gone, and you would be able to > > choose between the three porting strategies dependningon how your code > > base and user base looks: 1. Clean break. 2. Syncing with 2to3, 3. > > Supporting both 2.6 and 3.0. > > It's as Nick says. Run 2to3. Can you please explain why that doesn't > sound acceptable to you? By running 2to3, you *get* option 3; you > support 2.6 and 3.0 from a single code base. > Well, he is basically required to compile his source code before he can run it. This is quite uncommon for python code...
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
