Also, could the types module be renamed "builtin_classes" or "core_classes" or something like that? It was always a weird name because it wasn't if it contained all of the types in a Python distribution. Just a set of core-to-the-implementation ones.
Just out of curiousity: why is the type(x) function valuable when x.__class__ is a viable alternative and has been one for a long time. Paul Prescod _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
