"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:58 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All I really mean to fix is to standardize the terminology, especially > > in repr(). > > So you don't want to be called a wimp anymore ?-)
Indeed. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r23331 | gvanrossum | 2001-09-25 05:56:29 +0200 (Di, 25 Sep 2001) | 5 > lines > > Change repr() of a new-style class to say <class 'ClassName'> rather > than <type 'ClassName'>. Exception: if it's a built-in type or an > extension type, continue to call it <type 'ClassName>. Call me a > wimp, but I don't want to break more user code than necessary. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Well, if we're going to break user code, 3.0 is the time to do it. :-) =============================== Could not find this in tracker, so http://bugs.python.org/issue2565
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
