On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few comments: > > Intro to delete: could point out here that anyone who really wants a > deleted module can/should update it to work with 3.0 and make available > through PyPI.
Guido and I discussed this and he pointed out that if someone went that far we probably should consider keeping the module. But there was originally a comment along those lines. > --------- > > obsolete/popen2 ... "replaces them." > 'them' should be 'it': Yep. I originally had 'commands' and 'popen2' as the same bullet point. > any other popenx modules seem to be gone > already > --------------- > > > "This > will be accomplished by using the ``as`` keyword in import statements > to bind in the module namespace to the old name while importing based > on the new name. > " > This should only be done if there is not already an 'as' clause! > If there is, just substitute. Done. > ----------------------- > +1 on everything proposed. This will make the stdlib less confusing, > especially for newcomers. > > I might like to see even more packages, but do not have the energy to > research/propose/argue for any. =) Yeah, it was tough to come up with the ones there, especially trying to keep with the "new packages only when the names are an improvement" guideline. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
