On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * sched > > > > + Replaced by threading.Timer. > > I don't see sched as obsoleted by threading.Timer. It's much simpler > to use (no need for locking) and more efficient (no legions of > sleeping threads). Instead, maybe it should be removed because it's > trivial to reimplement as well as being overshadowed by all the other > event loops built into bigger systems (tk, qt, gtk, twisted, etc)? > More importantly, sched doesn't use threads, so replacing it with threading.Timer is inappropriate :) But yes, it should just go. -- Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
