-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 9, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Even if I can't contribute very much at the moment, I'm still +1 to
that.
I doubt Python would get nice publicity if we released a 3.0 but had
to
tell everyone, "but don't really use it yet, it may still contain any
number of showstoppers."
I completely agree. We should not release anything that's not ready.
Assuming that we all agree that 2.6 is much closer to being ready,
that gives us two options: delay 2.6 to coincide with 3.0 or split the
releases. The latter seems like the wisest choice to meet our goals.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSMZ5L3EjvBPtnXfVAQJwSQP/U7FFFI8ao5Xesf6F3QFIUMYFeISrlhof
9ynkQXAskUMelAfayGMSd2nD2+buXA7gyBWplAAEF2rtLhZ3N0+zeh/2HnqcY0b9
EtUM5shAIMlb2948IMoXlxSMplH5auBHMLYFnuPAIH9ERXsGVfyihLnUarAfzmT+
XrWfjrU62TA=
=CUR4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
