2008/9/10 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sep 10, 2008, at 5:23 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> I actually find it helpful to have the PyPI packages that ended up in >> the stdlib use different names, since that opens up the possibility >> to use the more current releases from PyPI in an application. > > I'm with Marc-Andre on this; using the same module names for different codebases is a pain. The standard library and the rest of the Python world shouldn't overlap module names (this is part of why many have requested a separate namespace for the Python standard library).
+1. Remember the xml / _xmlplus debacle? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
