Glenn Linderman wrote: > Even 8-bit binary can be translated into a > sequence of Unicode codepoints with the same numeric value, for example.
No, no, no, no. Using latin-1 to tunnel binary data through Unicode just gets us straight back into the "is it text or bytes?" hell that is the 8-bit string in 2.x. It defeats the entire point of making the break between str and bytes in 3.0 in the first place. If something is potentially arbitrary binary data, we need to treat it that way and use bytes. People are just going to have to get over their aesthetic objections to the leading b on their bytes literals. Heck, be happy you don't have to write bytes(map(ord, 'literal')) as was the case in the early stages of 3.0 :) Providing a Unicode based text API over the top for the cases where handling malformed data isn't necessary may be convenient and a good idea, but it shouldn't be the only API (3.0 is already guilty of that in a few places - we shouldn't be adding more). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
