-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
But if that's not the case, wouldn't it make more sense to keep
email out of
the initial 3.0 release, rather than put a half-broken version in
with
special "we can totally change the API for the next release"
dispensation?
Tough call. I'm inclined to give people *something* in 3.0 with the
promise we'll fix it in 3.1, rather than withholding it altogether.
I think that's the right thing to do, because large parts of the API
will be the same, and where ever it's possible, we should provide a
migration path for the new API (e.g. DeprecationWarnings, etc.).
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSRM7zXEjvBPtnXfVAQKlMQP/YxW+AWdFb83NC9mpL3uBZrNkEygKlcp6
IoyehmucOfCmPGp8dwCkw/BP9qCoKXkFyCnMbIuLOhbyzYfPsPD822voGjeLNb2O
bYPMoMSOdlUPJaV4trdGd3RR7KIYAwhXymWW1MxnkyfDZ1mNyRRJyR3SMPJiLZoL
/MDfrcchcGQ=
=z39Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
