-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 18, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Facundo Batista wrote:
2008/11/17 Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Martin suggests, and I agree, that we should release Python 3.0
final and
2.6.1 at the same time. Makes sense to me. That would mean that
Python
2.6.1 should be ready on 03-Dec (well, if Python 3.0 is ready then!).
2.6.1 only two months after 2.6? Why so quickly?
Actually, I've wanted to do timed releases, though I think monthly is
unrealistic. Maybe every two months is about the right time frame.
Timed releases are nice because everybody then knows when a patch is
due, from developers to downstream consumers.
Anyway, I don't see any added value in the synchronization, so taking
in consideration all the effort you're putting in these releases, I
would just want to minimize your workload... which is easier to you?
doing both at the same time or not?
We're getting releases down to a science now! :) Actually the most
painful part is updating the web site, so I plan adding some
automation around that process too. OTOH, this is the first point
release I'll be doing with the new script, so it'll be interesting to
debug that process.
As for synchronization, I think it's a good habit to get into, if my
plan to do timed releases works out.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSSLShXEjvBPtnXfVAQL90QP/UfWRXr0esTim+DtQJs9Fd/+Lj9PpuBV6
UCB7pAwl8uf7qIAwjDkCsdg3VD/wxzmzuwDAB8T19PF5dNxsrKWdBEzhymVpLU8T
cch0Vlaevm6Co/kDp8VhyoKlPs7LDhGkC2G04qDSOETo8Ci84rBOlWd7n1KvUrYZ
01Pn6eZHdqA=
=k9FS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
