"Martin v. Löwis" writes: > While I'm happy that Barry has automated his part to a high degree, > my part is, unfortunately, much less automated. I could personally > automate the build process a bit more, but part of it is also testing > of the installers, which is manual.
Maybe you could delegate a lot of the testing to competent volunteers? That would be probably 2 times as much work the first couple of times, (you'd need to formalize your "script" for testing[1] and then check that the volunteers are understanding it correctly, etc) but if they are reliable you could turn that around a lot faster in the future. Footnotes: [1] Doesn't Windows have a way to send synthetic GUI events to a program? There ought to be a way to really script that, as the Python installer process presumbly doesn't change much from release to release. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
