STINNER Victor <[email protected]> added the comment: > Ok, updated patch.
"ret = ~mask + 1;" looks wrong: (~0xFFFFFF80+1) gives 128, not 127. I don't see why you need: + if (ret < 128) + return 127; + if (ret < 256) + return 255; #undef ASCII_CHAR_MASK should be #undef UCS1_ASCII_CHAR_MASK #error Invalid STRINGLIB_SIZEOF_CHAR (must be 1, 2 or 4) should be #error Invalid STRINGLIB_SIZEOF_CHAR (must be 2 or 4) Why do you need these forward declarations? It's maybe related to another patch? static PyObject * +unicode_fromascii(const unsigned char *s, Py_ssize_t size); +static PyObject * +_PyUnicode_FromUCS1(const unsigned char *s, Py_ssize_t size); +static PyObject * +_PyUnicode_FromUCS2(const Py_UCS2 *s, Py_ssize_t size); +static PyObject * +_PyUnicode_FromUCS4(const Py_UCS4 *s, Py_ssize_t size); (You kept Py_UCS4 for "Py_UCS4 bits", but Py_UCS4 is maybe just fine.) By the way, your function rocks :-) Use bit masks is a great idea, especially your "bits = p[0] | p[1] | p[2] | p[3]" "hack". ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13155> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
