Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> added the comment: > I strongly feel that existing code importing ElementTree or cElementTree > should not be broken. Let’s add transparent import from _elementtree to > ElementTree without breaking existing uses of cET. >
AFAICS there's currently no disagreement on this point. The import from cElementTree will keep working in 3.3 as it always had. However, the explicit mention of cElementTree should be removed from the documentation of ElementTree. The only remaining question is whether a silent deprecation warning should be added in cElementTree. > I think that 3.2 and 2.7 should get a doc note about cET, do we have a bug > for this? > What doc note? Something in the spirit of: "Note that in 3.3, the accelerated C implementation will be provided by default when importing ElementTree" - or do you mean something else? I don't think there's an open bug for this. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13988> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
