STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Result of the benchmark before/after my commit. I prefer an unit over manually
manipulate long as short or bytes, because I think that the compiler knows
better how to optimize operations on integers.
unpatched:
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'import codecs; d = codecs.utf_16_be_decode; x = (" " *
1000).encode("utf-16be")' 'd(x)'
100000 loops, best of 3: 4.64 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'import codecs; d = codecs.utf_16_be_decode; x =
("\u263A" * 1000).encode("utf-16be")' 'd(x)'
100000 loops, best of 3: 5.87 usec per loop
patched:
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'import codecs; d = codecs.utf_16_be_decode; x = (" " *
1000).encode("utf-16be")' 'd(x)'
100000 loops, best of 3: 3.53 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'import codecs; d = codecs.utf_16_be_decode; x =
("\u263A" * 1000).encode("utf-16be")' 'd(x)'
100000 loops, best of 3: 4.85 usec per loop
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14249>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
