STINNER Victor <[email protected]> added the comment:
Ok, benchmarks have spoken, amen. I applied Serhiy Storchaka's patch (version
3). I just replaced expressions in calls to Py_MAX by variables: Py_MAX is a
macro and it may have to compute each expression twice. I didn't check if it's
more or less efficient. Thanks Serhiy for your contribution! I added your name
to Misc/ACKS.
We may change Py_MIN/Py_MAX to something more efficient using typeof():
#define max(a,b) \
({ typeof (a) _a = (a); \
typeof (b) _b = (b); \
_a > _b ? _a : _b; })
I don't know which C compilers support it, but gcc does, at least.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14249>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
