Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: On 02.12.2014 20:10, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > Le 02/12/2014 19:59, Marc-Andre Lemburg a écrit : >> >> My main point was that we shouldn't start adding tags for e.g. >> PPC, Intel, ARM, etc. since platforms needing to support multiple >> such architectures will typically support fat builds anyway. >> >> How about using these flags: >> >> b0 - 16-bit >> b1 - 32-bit >> b2 - 64-bit >> b3 - 128-bit > > Fair enough, although I think we only need 32-bit and 64-bit for now, > and "32b" vs. "64b" would probably be more readable :-)
True, I'm just not sure what the parsing requirements are and the ABI version names are too long already, IMO. PEP 425 used a nice short variant for the Python part. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22980> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
