Dubslow <buns...@gmail.com> added the comment: Note that this follows a bit of discussion on python-ideas, in two threads:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-November/047920.html https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-November/047989.html I agree the zip_longest-derived solution is both easier to read/understand and also not really accurate, especially in extreme cases. But, and see the second thread, I think it might just be better to add this funcitonality itself to itertools, under the name zip_flat -- per the second thread, there's a lot of confusion around the topic beyond just the suitability of the current recipe (including such things as lack of a clear name, legibility, efficiency, and brevity -- a fair number of people are looking for one or two liners, even if that doesn't really exist). (One alternative to zip_flat would be to add a second keyword argument to zip_longest that *doesn't* use a fillvalue, producing variable-length tuples when the supplied iters run out. Then the recipe and the entire conversation/topic could be replaced by "yield from zip_longest(*iters, usefill=False)".) Despite that opinion, this suggested change is better than nothing. ---------- nosy: +Dubslow _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32099> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
