Zachary Ware <zachary.w...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Ok, Yury clarified a few points before I got my message submitted there, so
some of my last message may be a bit misguided. In particular, the problems
with just using `asyncio.run` are clearer to me now.
To give my answers to Yury's open questions:
- We should have an async setUpClass capability, one way or another.
- I would say event loop per class. If someone really needs event loop per
method, they can create separate classes per method. It's ugly, but effective.
- We should have an async setUp capability. Maybe we could add a helper method
to be called from setUp rather than adding a whole new asyncSetUp into the
protocol? That eliminates the problem of which goes first.
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list