Petter S <petter.strandm...@gmail.com> added the comment: > 1. Do we need support for async versions of setUp, setUpClass, etc? In my > opinion: yes.
I completely agree. I would imagine many or most real-world tests requiring async setUp. There is also the question on how a custom loop etc. can be used in the unit test class. How about this: unittest.TestCase gets a very small refactor in which a overridable helper method is used to run the test method. This helper method can then be changed to run async methods in a subclass AsyncioTestCase (that probably should live in asyncio). Pull request 6005 contained such a helper method, but the async part could be implemented in the subclass instead. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32972> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
