New submission from Brandt Bucher <brandtbuc...@gmail.com>:
This has been discussed before, but we now have examples in the news of glob's non-deterministic behavior causing some real headaches for hundreds of people in the scientific community. After some cursory discussion (https://discuss.python.org/t/a-code-glitch-may-have-caused-errors-in-more-than-100-published-studies/2583) it was suggested that this issue would at least be worth revisiting, given the damage... bad programming practices aside. The attached patch guarantees glob/iglob traversal order across all platforms, and modifies all of the existing tests to check for this. One reason this was rejected twice before (in both issue 21748, four years ago, and issue 30461, two years ago) was the argument that the user could always just call "sorted" on the returned list if they wanted ordered results. Aside from losing the laziness of iglob, this solution also loses the traversal order, since recursive globs use a breadth-first search. In the attached patch, iglob is still just as lazy as ever, and the traversal is unchanged for anyone using a platform that already returns sorted results. ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 356344 nosy: brandtbucher, njs priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Deterministic globbing. type: enhancement versions: Python 3.9 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38764> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
