Ken Jin <kenjin4...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Dear Jack, good catch! My only worry is that if we make the list exhaustive, it would be too lengthy, or that it might not be feasible to continuously update it every time a new generic type supports the feature. Maybe a line somewhere to mention that most container types in Python should support the feature, and that the list provided is non-exhaustive should suffice? I'm not sure, nosy-ing Guido and Ivan to the list for their thoughts on this. ---------- nosy: +gvanrossum, kj, levkivskyi _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42280> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
