jack1142 <kuba.kuc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I was thinking that this could be the case but if I'm not mistaken, there's actually quite a lot of types in this list that aren't collections (awaitable, coroutine, iterable, iterator, generator, the async versions of those, callable, *hmm, are views collections?*, and the ones you mentioned), so I figured that listing *only* collections might have not been the intention when this was written. But listing all of the generics in Python would indeed be lengthy so it might make sense to limit it to collections nonetheless, I'm not really sure about it though. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42280> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
