On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:50 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> > wrote: >> >> Am 29.12.12 01:21, schrieb Brett Cannon: >> >> > It doesn't matter to me who writes the email. I was not thinking so >> > formally, bit it wouldn't hurt. >> >> So has any action been taken? > > > I haven't talked with him again yet. If I don't get a chance to do it in > the following days I'll write him an email.
I think it's important that this be done in the form of an official e-mail as Brett originally suggested, so that it's clear to everyone what was said and is not just another side discussion. --Chris > >> >> If not, I'll communicate it to him. I'm >> personally worried most about the tracker, so I'd propose the policy >> - he must not reopen any issues. If he really thinks important >> information was not considered, he can post them to the closed issue. >> - he must not resubmit a duplicate of one of his closed issues. >> > > I think I mentioned this last time we talked, and I'll make sure to make it > clearer next time. > > Best Regards, > Ezio Melotti > > >> >> Regards, >> Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
