On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller <jnol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Precisely. None of us are lawyers; the CLA was made by lawyers to be >> compatible with the Python license "stack" which has its own set of issues. >> >> That all said; again, the likelihood of short term alteration of the CLA is >> a non starter, so he can feel free to take his time to understand why we >> require contributions to be licensed to the PSF under the listed licenses. >> >> However; I've sent this to a real lawyer for his opinion. > > Since this came up again on python-dev, did you ever receive any reply > from the real lawyer? > > Best Regards, > Ezio Melotti Yup, but we sort of got distracted with a protracted trademark dispute legal thing that's slightly more important. I'm working it _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
