On 01/01/2013 11:13 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Brian Curtin <br...@python.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: >>>> On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: >>>> >>>>> I say Ezio lets him know that this is the plan since he talked to him >>>>> recently and is in the no-ban-yet camp. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yesterday I talked to him, informed him about the probation and showed >>>>> him this >>>>> message. I hope this is official enough. >>>> >>>> So, what was the reaction? That is the important thing to know... >>>> >>> >>> He acknowledged the fact, but I think he had already understood the >>> issue from our previous conversation. >> >> ...and? >> >> Does he care about what was said? Is he going to do anything about his >> actions? > > He does, and he is already trying to improve. We already discussed > about the issue and how to solve it in our previous conversation (see > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2012-December/002307.html), > so informing him about the probation only served to let him know the > specific punishment(s) he might face.
Good, sounds like we did all we can now. >> The fact that this discussion sidetracked into contributor >> agreements is not a good sign to me. He should have just said those >> things himself to the PSF's legal counsel, not in response to an email >> about his behavior... > > I'm doing this via chat (I think it's better/more effective than > emails), so sidetracking is not so unexpected (we even ended up > discussing things that are completely unrelated after we clarified the > important points). The discussion about the CLA started because he > said that some of the "accusations" in the thread are not true -- in > particular that "He flat-out refuses to sign any contributor > agreement". I asked him why he hasn't signed it and if there was any > problem with the contributor agreement, and so he replied. I still don't understand the CA issue: either he sent one some months back, and it got lost: then he can re-submit it. Or he thinks there is something wrong with it and it shouldn't be signed: then why did he do so in the first place (and frankly, why did nobody else (among them big corporations) find a cause for concern)? cheers, Georg _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
