2013/3/20 Ned Deily <n...@acm.org>: > Please, this is definitely not the right place to discuss the issue of > IDLE in the stdlib. It has been discussed repeatedly and the conclusion > is always that it is an important part of the batteries-included > experience.
I don't propose to remove IDLE from the stdlib, just move the code to another repository to allow to maintain it more easily. And then re-add IDLE to the stdlib at each Python release. We might also release IDLE more frequently using an external repository. > More importantly, PEP 434, is out for review concerning > IDLE maintenance and features, is currently out for review. That would > be a much more appropriate place to bring up any concerns. (I will be > forwarding my comments to the PEP soon, BTW.) Oh sorry, I missed this PEP. I will read it. Victor _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
