I have nothing against Brian personally, but I have a process question: Has he previously gotten patches accepted to the stdlib, or is this a preemptive request? I think the usual route is to grant commit access after the stream of patches from a contributor has taken the form of a steady stream (or at least trickle) of high-quality patches, and the core committers are tired of committing on that person's behalf and confident that the contributor will seek review when appropriate.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Brian Kearns for commit. He's been a committer on PyPy > for about a year and a half now, and in particular he's done a bunch of > "Python version" works: things like upgrading us from the 2.7.3 stdlib to > the 2.7.6 stdlib, and py3k work. He's interested in having commit for the > purposes of doing interop work on the stdlib tests: things like making sure > tests aren't reliant on refcounting, correctly marking tests as impl > details, etc. > > Thanks, > Alex > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right > to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) > "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero > GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084 > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
