On 11 Mar 2014 09:10, "Antoine Pitrou" <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > On lun., 2014-03-10 at 16:02 -0700, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to propose Brian Kearns for commit. He's been a committer on > > PyPy for about a year and a half now, and in particular he's done a > > bunch of "Python version" works: things like upgrading us from the > > 2.7.3 stdlib to the 2.7.6 stdlib, and py3k work. He's interested in > > having commit for the purposes of doing interop work on the stdlib > > tests: things like making sure tests aren't reliant on refcounting, > > correctly marking tests as impl details, etc. > > I'd really prefer someone to have experience in contributing to CPython > before they get commit rights. I might mistaken, but I can't find any > contribution bearing Brain's name. > > Furthermore, giving arbitrary commit rights to core devs of third-party > projects (such as PyPy and Twisted) doesn't seem to have produced any > significant CPython contributions from them, IIRC.
Aye, our processes are currently arcane enough that posting a patch to the tracker is *less* work than doing the commit yourself (on the other hand, it depends on another human to get it committed). On the other hand, if Brian has read PEP 462 and *still* wants to commit patches directly, then I wouldn't be opposed (given Alex's recommendation). Call it +0. Cheers, Nick. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
