On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:38 PM Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 12:09, Brett Cannon wrote: > > The implementation for PEP 488 is basically done (sans Windows installer > > stuff). I did the work in a features repo at > > https://hg.python.org/features/pep-488/ . Once I have addressed reviewer > > comments at http://bugs.python.org/issue23731 , would people prefer I > > simply push the features repo to hg.python.org/cpython and have the more > > granular history but have various "merge default" commits, or would > > people > > rather I do one massive commit? > > I tend to prefer the one massive commit especially if there's a lot of > "in progress" commits in the branch. It makes for cleaner and > more-transactional history. > The commits are actually self-contained so that's not an issue in this case. But I do understand the desire for the easy rollback potential.
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
