On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:56 PM Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you choose to merge, I would prefer that you rebase your changes > before to avoid multiple merges. IMO the best to avoid merges at all > :-) > It's sounding like one massive patch is the best option for people. > > Did someone review your large change? > It just went up earlier today, so no. It's actually a fairly simple patch, it's just there was a lot of files involved that had some comment mentioning .pyo files. -Brett > > Victor > > 2015-04-01 18:09 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon <bcan...@gmail.com>: > > The implementation for PEP 488 is basically done (sans Windows installer > > stuff). I did the work in a features repo at > > https://hg.python.org/features/pep-488/ . Once I have addressed reviewer > > comments at http://bugs.python.org/issue23731 , would people prefer I > simply > > push the features repo to hg.python.org/cpython and have the more > granular > > history but have various "merge default" commits, or would people rather > I > > do one massive commit? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
