On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
> I'm not sure that you'd see much savings. You'd only get deltas that were > never merged to master excluded. Point taken though. > Is the expectation that a Git clone would be significantly larger than an Hg clone of an equivalent repo? I currently often rely on a single Hg clone containing all branches. +1 on not supporting ESR, for the stated reason. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
