On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 at 14:09 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > >> I'm not sure that you'd see much savings. You'd only get deltas that were >> never merged to master excluded. Point taken though. >> > > Is the expectation that a Git clone would be significantly larger than an > Hg clone of an equivalent repo? I currently often rely on a single Hg clone > containing all branches. > I'm not sure, which is why I'm asking what difference it would make if we separated out Python 2 branches into their own clone from Python 3 branches. > > +1 on not supporting ESR, for the stated reason. > +1 from me as well for not supporting ESR. -Brett > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
