> On Jul 18, 2018, at 4:14 PM, Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Let's be clear that we're not yet at the stage where we can vote for > anything, let alone how to vote.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:03 PM Łukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> wrote: > I don't understand what you mean. Before we get to vote on a variant of PEP > 2, we need to decide how we are supposed to perform that vote. This needs to > be decided before we discuss councils, dictators, and so on because it's all > moot if there is no accepted way to agree which governance model we want. Humans do so love to argue! Both the decision-making process and the candidate decisions are reasonable to discuss; there's no intrinsic ordering constraint for reasonable discussion. We need to decide on the decision-making mechanism before the decision can be made, but that's it. PEP 2 is (currently) the "Procedure for Adding New Modules". Though superseded, recycling the PEP number seems out of character with the RFC process from which we derived the PEP process. Let's be cautious about recycling like that; integers are cheap. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fred at fdrake.net> "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
