Le 05/11/2018 à 23:08, Victor Stinner a écrit : > Le sam. 3 nov. 2018 à 10:39, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> a écrit : >>> I'm unhappy with the "[] Further discussion" choice. We have a >>> governance crisis. Many people would like to see it resolved as soon >>> as possible, I don't see the ability to vote for "[] Further >>> discussion" as a way to resolve this crisis. >> >> Why are you worried? If many people would like to see the "crisis" (I >> would call it a void) resolved early, then probably "Further discussion" >> won't win. So how is its presence a problem? > > PEPs cannot be approved since July.
Let me repeat the question: if "Further discussion" has no chance of winning, why are you bothered by its presence? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
