On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ernest W. Durbin III <[email protected]> wrote:
> Antoine noted the same lack of transparency at > https://discuss.python.org/t/2019-steering-council-election-results/824/3?u=ewdurbin > . > > Ultimately I chose to initial publish results ASAP at the minimum > granularity necessary given that there wasn’t direction on what level of > detail should be published. I agree that transparency is key here, but as > it wasn’t specified on in 8016/13/8100 I went with what we have. > > I can open a PR to 8100 with detailed results if no objections are heard. > I would wait until you have explicit permission from every candidate. (You probably will have to reach out to some.) I hereby grant you mine. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
