Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Any objection to just a SqlSession base class?
May be - it depends on how complex it becomes. Any attempts I've to
generalize SQL/DB stuff tend to become a mess since there are no firm
standards in this area, so this just may be something for the "contrib"
(or whatever it ends up being), like Nicolas pointed out.
I'm a little concerned about staying focused on closing the last bugs so
that we get to a point where a release can be made, since there hasn't
been one in such a long time...
I was not actually proposing a SqlSession class for 3.2.0. I just want
to finish off the last couple of issues of FileSession for this release,
and catalog the SqlSession idea as a possible future feature.
It really would be helpful if everyone could read minds. Maybe we could
put a mind-reading feature in 3.3? :) Although that might push 3.3's
release back to 2020. And could it be made thread safe...
Regards,
Jim
