I've tried to build 3.1.4 from the tarball on minotaur and of course it works. Could it be possible that the recent changes in the configure script cause the problem ?
Regards, Nicolas 2005/9/10, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I thought I'd it a shot on minotaur as well. > > Poking around a bit reveals that the default apache is indeed 1.3. It > looks like there might be a viable apache2 hiding in > /usr/local/apache2-install/www.apache.org/current. > > eg ./configure > --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2-install/www.apache.org/current/apxs > > Unfortunately, I'm getting the same errors as Grisha reported starting with: > mod_python.c:34: error: syntax error before '*' token > > Regards, > Jim > > Nicolas Lehuen wrote: > > I tried to build it under minotaur as well, but "./configure" only > > finds a 1.3.33 version of Apache, so I can't go further. I can't help > > much here since I'm not used to FreeBSD... > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas > > > > 2005/9/9, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>Just tried compiling it on minotaur and I get the same error. minotaur is > >>FreeBSD 5.4, so it looks like we have a -1. I don't know how much time > >>I'll have this weekend, so I might or might not look into the cause of > >>this - but anyone else with access to a FreeBSD box, you're more than > >>welcome to dig in... :-) > >> > >>Grisha > >> > >> > >>On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > >>> > >>>>Don't know about versions, but I'd _really_ like to see a FreeBSD +1 at > >>>>this point :-) Graham - don't you have FreeBSD access somewhere? > >>> > >>>If Graham can't help out maybe we could recruit a volunteer on the > >>>mod_python > >>>list? > >>> > >>> > >>>>On the versioning discussion - I don't like 4.0, I think 3.3 should be the > >>>>next version after 3.2.x. As far as even/odd stable/unstable - the Linux > >>>>kernel folks have abandoned it because it didn't work for them. The > >>>>fallacy is that you cannot know ahead of time what is stable and what is > >>>>not. > >>>> > >>>>My preference is to just follow versions incrementally, and making it > >>>>known which version is stable or not independently of the version number, > >>>>which is what the HTTPD folks have been doing. > >>> > >>>I can't get worked up one way or another wrt to a version numbering scheme, > >>>as long as we release *something*. ;) > >>> > >>>Regards, > >>>Jim > >>> > >> > > > >
