Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > On 13/09/2006, at 8:45 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote: > >> Woot Woot Woot! We have our wiki! >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/mod_python/ >> >> Now comes the hard part... what the heck are we going to do with it? :) > > Ahhh, more work. :-( > > Obviously the FAQ stuff can go over there, but I would really like to > see the > main LaTeX documentation converted and hosted there so it can be updated > more easily. Might have to ask Grisha's opinion on that, he might want > to see > something be able to still be downloadable with the source code itself. In > practice though, how many actually use the LaTeX source to generate their > own documentation, I would guess most go to the web site anyway. We would > have to be careful though to make sure we annotate features to show over > time at which version they were introduced, since we will not have parallel > snapshots of documentation for each major release.
Regarding hosting the official documentation within a wiki... A topic that has recently come up on infra@ is that anything that is editable by people without ASF CLAs on file is ineligible to be shipped as part of an official Apache release. Just thought I ought to call attention to that point, if wiki-fication of the main docs is being considered. Other projects have approached this by having two separate wikis, the documentation one being write-access-restricted to CLA-ed people. Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
