Jeff Robbins wrote ..
> Graham,
> 
> These instructions are not sufficient.  The apache environment I have on
> windows has include files in <apachesr>/include but also in 
> <apachesrc>/srclib/apr/include, <apachesrc>/srclib/apr-iconv/include, and
> <apachesrc>/srclib/apr-util/include
> 
> Setting the APACHESRC environmental per the instructions only finds the
> includes in $APACHESRC/include but not the apr files like apr.h in the
> error 
> I posted.  In the vcproj file, I had to tell the IDE in some dialog where
> to 
> find these include files.  Is there some other environmental or is there
> some copy phase in the build on Linux that gets all the include files into
> $APACHESRC/include?

All this suggests you are setting APACHESRC to where the original source code
for Apache resides. Can you see if there is a distinct area where the include
files are installed into along with Apache binaries, modules, config etc. I'm
not a Windows person, but do you have a \Apache2 directory with an include
directory under that. If so, set APACHESRC to \Apache2. If not, then will have
to hope Nicolas is reading email at the moment and comment and he is the
one who normally builds the Win32 binary releases for us.

> Where is apr.h on your machine?

In the single include directory along with ap_*.h header files etc where Apache
was installed into.

Graham

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <python-dev@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 20:18
> Subject: Re: mod_python 3.3.0-dev-20061109 tests on Win32
> 
> 
> > Try follow these instructions:
> >
> >  http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-September/022092.html
> >
> > If these are correct, they probably should be put in the source code
> if 
> > they
> > aren't already.
> >
> > Graham
> >
> > Jeff Robbins wrote ..
> >> re: building on Win32
> >>
> >> I tried using setup.py but even once I set APACHESRC it still couldn't
> >> find
> >> the apr* include directories.  I set ext_modules = [PSPModule] alone
> and
> >> it
> >> built _psp.pyd no problem!
> >>
> >>
> >> C:\work\mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109\dist>python setup.py build
> >> running build
> >> running build_py
> >> running build_ext
> >> building 'mod_python_so' extension
> >> C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Vc7\bin\cl.exe /c
> >> /nologo
> >> /Ox
> >>  /MD /W3 /GX
> >> /DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -DNDEBUG -D_WINDOWS -IC:\work\mod_python-3.3.0-dev
> >> -20061109\src\include -IC:\work\httpd-2.2.3\include -IC:\Python24\include
> >> -IC:\P
> >> ython24\PC /TcC:\work\mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109\src\mod_python.c
> >> /FoC:\work\
> >> mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109\src\mod_python.obj
> >> mod_python.c
> >> c:\work\httpd-2.2.3\include\ap_config.h(25) : fatal error C1083: Cannot
> >> open
> >> inc
> >> lude file: 'apr.h': No such file or directory
> >> error: command '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET
> >> 2003\Vc7\bin\cl.e
> >> xe"' failed with exit status 2
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "Jeff Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Cc: "python-dev list" <python-dev@httpd.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 20:18
> >> Subject: Re: mod_python 3.3.0-dev-20061109 tests on Win32
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On 12/11/2006, at 12:31 AM, Jeff Robbins wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 3 problems found on Win32:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) _psp didn't build and I don't know how to build it
> >> >
> >> > How are you trying to build mod_python in the first place? Are you
> >> > using
> >> > dist/build_installer.bat or using VisualStudio project file. The 
> >> > latter
> >> > isn't
> >> > really used any longer and isn't tested. We know that it doesn't list
> >> the
> >> > finfoobject.c file for a start.
> >> >
> >> >> 2) In the 'Testing PythonImport' test, the path separators in the
> two
> >> >> paths being compared are different (no doubt due to Win32  backslash
> >> vs
> >> >> forward slash issues)
> >> >>
> >> >> the tests.py code does this:
> >> >>    directory = os.path.dirname(__file__)
> >> >>    assert(sys.path.count(directory) == 1)
> >> >>
> >> >> os.path.dirname(__file__) is 'C:\\work\\mod_python-3.3.0-
> >> >> dev-20061109\\test\\htdocs'
> >> >>
> >> >> yet sys.path has this in it 'C:/work/mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109/
> >> >> test\\\\htdocs'
> >> >>
> >> >> so the assert fails since the first string can't be found in  sys.path
> >> >> (count == 0)
> >> >
> >> > If in test/test.py you change:
> >> >
> >> >         c = Container(PythonPath("[r'%s']+sys.path" % DOCUMENT_ROOT),
> >> >
> >> > to:
> >> >
> >> >         c = Container(PythonPath("[r'%s']+sys.path" %
> >> > os.path.normpath(DOCUMENT_ROOT)),
> >> >
> >> > does it pass?
> >> >
> >> >> 3) in test_interpreter_per_directory() the code does this:
> >> >>        rsp = self.vhost_get("test_interpreter_per_directory", '/
> >> >> subdir/foo.py').upper()
> >> >>
> >> >> interpreter+'SUBDIR/' is 'C:/WORK/MOD_PYTHON-3.3.0-DEV-20061109/
> >> >> TEST/HTDOCS/SUBDIR/'
> >> >> rsp is 'C:/WORK/MOD_PYTHON-3.3.0-DEV-20061109/TEST/HTDOCS/'
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't understand the tests.py code but it looks like in the
> >> >> interpreter() code
> >> >> def interpreter(req):
> >> >>    if req.phase == "PythonFixupHandler":
> >> >>        if req.filename[-1] != '/' and os.path.isdir(req.filename):
> >> >>            req.write(req.interpreter)
> >> >>            return apache.DONE
> >> >>        return apache.OK
> >> >>    else:
> >> >>        req.write(req.interpreter)
> >> >>        return apache.DONE
> >> >>
> >> >> perhaps the req.filename 'C:/work/mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109/
> >> >> test/htdocs/subdir' is supposed to pass the os.path.isdir() 
> >> >> test...but
> >> >> it doesn't.  There is no 'subdir' folder under htdocs so  on Win32,
> >> >> os.path.isdir() returns False.  Maybe this is an os  dependency?
> >> >
> >> > The 'subdir' directory exists in the tarball. Any chance you 
> >> > accidentally
> >> > deleted
> >> > it somehow? Can you in a fresh directory unpack the tarball, verify
> >> that
> >> > the
> >> > directory exists and then rebuild and retest?
> >> >
> >> > Graham
> >> >
> >> >
> > 

Reply via email to