Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian Sabbey wrote: > > > How about something like below? In the same way > > that "self" is passed "behind the scenes" as the first argument, so can > > the thunk be. > > > > with stopwatch() result dt: > > a() > > b() > > print 'it took', dt, 'seconds to compute' > > Something like that would be better, yes. Maybe even just > > dt = stopwatch(): > a() > b() > > Whatever keyword is used is bound to not sound right > for some usages, so it would be best if no keyword > were needed at all.
Since PEP 310 was already mentioned, can we just say that the discussion can be boiled down to different ways of spelling __enter__/__exit__ from PEP 310? If so, then if either one of you really want/need this kind of thing, maybe one of you should pick up the PEP, address the issues sufficiently, and make it happen. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
