On 5/8/05, Jp Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   If such a construct is to be introduced, the ideal spelling would seem to 
> be:
> 
>     for [VAR in] EXPR:
>         BLOCK1
>     finally:
>         BLOCK2

While I have not been following this discussion at all (I don't have
the energy or time to follow the development of yet another proposal -
I'll wait for the PEP) this does read more naturally to me than any of
the other contortions I've seen passing by.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to