Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 08:18 AM 5/16/2005 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> Paul Moore wrote: >> > Looping is definitely a wart. Looping may even be a real problem in >> > some cases. There may be cases where an explicit try...finally remains >> > better, simply to avoid an unwanted looping behaviour. >> >> I agree PEP 343 throws away too much that was good about PEP 340 - >> that's why >> I'm still updating PEP 3XX as the discussion continues. > > > Could you please stop calling it PEP 3XX and go ahead and submit it as a > real PEP? Either that, or post its URL *every* time you mention it, > because at this point I don't know where to go to read it, and the same > applies for each new person to enter the discussion. Thanks.
Sorry about that - I've been including the URL most of the time, but forgot on this occasion: http://members.iinet.net.au/~ncoghlan/public/pep-3XX.html Anyway, I think it's stable enough now that I can submit it to be put up on www.python.org (I'll notify the PEP editors directly once I fix a couple of errors in the current version - like the missing 'raise' in the statement semantics. . .). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
