Steven Bethard wrote:
> But that would be just as easy with a print() function. In the current
> syntax:
>
> print 'foo:', foo, 'bar:', bar, 'baz:', baz,
> print 'frobble', frobble
>
> In my proposed function:
>
> print('foo:', foo, 'bar:', bar, 'baz:', baz,
> 'frobble', frobble)
>
> To my (admittedly biased) eyes, the second version more obviously
> prints to a single line.
next use case:
print 'foo:', foo, 'bar:', bar, 'baz:', baz,
if frobble > 0:
print 'frobble', frobble
else:
print 'no frobble today'
</F>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
