François Pinard wrote: > The only practical reason to like this feature is sparing the need of > finding an otherwise useless name for the formal argument.
If the argument represents a coherent enough concept to be passed in as a tuple in the first place, it should be possible to find a meaningful name for it. Otherwise the elements should probably be passed in as separate arguments. > Yet, if I was given the choice between nested tuple function arguments, > and faster argument processing, the latter would win instantly. I believe that exactly the same bytecode results either way, so there's no speed advantage or penalty. Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
