On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote: > Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the > similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to > avoid and maybe that's why it hasn't happened yet for decorators. If > ever there was a makethreadsafe decorator, it should go in the thread > module, etc. I mean, come on, its like making a module just to store a > bunch of unrelated types just to lump them together because they're > types. Who wants that?
Like itertools? +1 for a decorators module. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
