Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I've pushed out a revised PEP 8
>
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html
>
> Please review and comment. Thanks everyone for providing an excellent
> discussion. Hopefully I have captured our current collective
> recommendations. I've also tried to simplify the text, while making it
> (somewhat) more prescriptive.
The only thing I strongly disagree with is the promotion of javaNaming
to equal footing with python_naming. We can look forward to future
programs that look like this:
class Something:
def __init__(self, i_care):
self.mem_a = pkga.uses_python_naming()
self.mem_b = pkgb.usesJavaNaming()
if i_care:
self.this_looks(self.mem_b.reallyCrap())
It gets worse if you subclass from modules using different conventions
in your own code. Ugly code.
- Dave
--
http://www.object-craft.com.au
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
