On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Josiah Carlson wrote: >> >> New superclasses for all built-in types (except for string and unicode, >> which already subclass from basestring). >> >> int, float, complex (long) : subclass from basenumber >> tuple, list, set : subclass from basesequence >> dict : subclass from basemapping > > set should be under basemapping.
Are you sure? Sets are not actually a mapping; they consist only of keys. The Python docs do not include sets under maps, and sets do not support some of the standard mapping methods (notably keys()). Raymond Hettinger has also talked about switching to a different internal structure for sets. (Should this discussion move to c.l.py? Normally I'd think so, but I think it's critical that the core developers agree about this. It's also critical for me to know because I'm writing a book, but that's not reason enough to stick with python-dev. ;-) -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire yourself a competent schmuck." --USENET schmuck (aka Robert Kern) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
