On 12/24/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, test_builtin and test_pep263 both passed on WinXP in rev 39757. > That's the last revision before the AST branch was merged. > > I can't build rev 39758 on WinXP (VC complains that pythoncore.vcproj > can't be loaded -- looks like it got checked in with unresolved SVN > conflict markers -- which isn't easy to do under SVN ;-( ), so don't > know about that. > > The first revision at which Python built again was 39791 (23 Oct), and > test_builtin and test_pep263 both fail under that the same way they > fail today. >
Both syntax errors, right? My mind is partially gone thanks to being on vacation so following this thread has been abnormally hard. =) Since it is a syntax error there won't be any bytecode to compare against. > I'm darned near certain that we're not using the _intended_ parsing > code on Windows now -- PGEN is still #define'd when the "final" > parsing code is compiled into python25.dll. Don't know how to fix > that (I don't understand it). But the AST branch didn't touch the parser (unless you are grouping ast.c and compile.c under the "parser" umbrella just to throw me off =). What can I do to help? Do you need me to step through something? Do you need to know how gcc is preprocessing some file? -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
