On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:31:46AM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Ian Bicking wrote: > > I just don't want people to feel discouraged when they try to contribute > > to the Python community and a PEP 13 could help direct people towards > > areas where their contributions are more likely to be useful. Also I > > think it is unfair to use python-list to clarify things that python-dev > > is not willing to clarify itself.
> But now: who is going to write it? "Guido should write it" clearly won't > work. And no, I'm explicitly not volunteering either. Well, the PEP will be mostly boilerplate anyway (unless there's a sudden influx of old ideas) so I'm sure I can whip something up before next weekend. I'll probably keep the actual list of rejected items to implicit self (which started the whole discussion), upgrading the Python parser beyond a simple LL(1), and maybe implicit ()'s for functioncalls, if I feel inspired. The exact wording, and additional rejects, can be discussed at length by those interested. -- Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
